One Response to “Halle Berry Turns Down Aretha Franklin Role and ex Gabriel Aubry filed a paternity petition”

  1. Venson Thomas says:

    Halle Berry has no business portraying Aretha Franklin on film and shows great wisdom in leaving the role alone. She looks nothing like her. And there are no singers that can beat Aretha at being Aretha which is what this is all about. You’d end up with as nonsensical a product as Lady Sings the Blues which had a lot more to do with Hollywood than it did with Billie Holiday. “What’s Love Got to Do With It,” the homage to Tina Turner, is the about the only biographical film for a singer that’s worked so far. (No, don’t bring up Susan Hayward.) The public can stand to be spared another attempt for a while.

    I have been a great, great fan of Ms. Franklin for many years and think she is worthy of far more than a film production that will end up being just a lot of junk. She’s a great singer with great musical intelligence whom deserves a great actress prepared to deliver as much on film as Ms. Franklin has on record. Hollywood is not ready for all that yet.

    What would be great is for the persons handling the late Sidney Pollack’s filming of her while she recorded the Amazing Grace album to get on the ball and get the thing in the stores. I can’t think of a greater tribute to her at present.

    Of course I’m hoping Lady Soul comes through this illness unscathed but should not my wish be granted Id like to see resulting works meant to be tributes to her be enlightening. What I’d like to know about Aretha, is more about her musical history and what prompted decisions she made in regard to it. I’d like to know about Carolyn and Erma. I also have never forgotten that from the beginning Aretha was tight lipped when it came to her life and family.

Leave a Reply